- Ergebnisse als:
- Druckansicht
- Endnote (RIS)
- BibTeX
- Tabelle: CSV | HTML
Bücher und Buchkapitel
Bücher und Buchkapitel
Bücher und Buchkapitel
Leitbild und Forschungsprofil
Molekulare Signalverarbeitung
Natur- und Wirkstoffchemie
Biochemie pflanzlicher Interaktionen
Stoffwechsel- und Zellbiologie
Unabhängige Nachwuchsgruppen
Program Center MetaCom
Publikationen
Gute Wissenschaftliche Praxis
Forschungsförderung
Netzwerke und Verbundprojekte
Symposien und Kolloquien
Alumni-Forschungsgruppen
Publikationen
Bücher und Buchkapitel
Conformational analysis by NMR spectroscopy and molecular modeling revealed a left-handed PPII helix-like structure for Trp2-Tat(1–9) (cis and trans) and an even more flexible structure for TXA2-R(1–9).PPII helices form a well-defined structural class comparable with the other structures defined in proteins and are characterized by exposed, mobile structures with 4–8 residues, mostly found on the protein surface. Polyproline II helices are mainly identified by their torsion angles of φ∼−75° and Ψ∼145−. They do not form regular interchain hydrogen bonds, but are hydrogen bonded with water molecules. PPII helices have a strong preference for the amino acid proline, although it is not necessarily present. These features were also reported for the parent peptide Tat(1–9)4 as well as for the well known DP IV substrates neuropeptide Y and pancreatic polypeptide5 suggesting that PPII-like helical structures represent a favored structural class for the interaction with DP IV.Thus, the considerable enhancement of the inhibition capacity of both Trp2-Tat(1–9) and TXA2-R(1–9) compared to the moderate inhibitor Tat(1–9)2, Ki=2.68±0.01 10−4 M, can only be due to tryptophan in the second position suggesting that its side chain is favored to exhibit attractive hydrophobic interactions with DP IV compared with aspartic acid.On the other hand, we could show recently that Tat(1–9) and its analogues as well as TXA2-R(1–9) inhibit DP IV according to different inhibition mechanisms (Lorey et al., manuscript submitted). One possible explanation for these findings might be enzyme-ligand interactions relying on multiple weak binding sites as described for PPII helices5 rather than specific lock and key binding. Certainly, only an X-ray structure of DP IV would help to understand the interaction of DP IV with inhibitors.
Bücher und Buchkapitel
The human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV-1) transactivator Tat occurs extracellularly and exerts immunosuppressive effects. Interestingly, Tat inhibits dipeptidyl peptidase IV (DP IV) activity of the T cellactivation marker CD26. The short N-terminal nonapeptideTat(l-9), MDPVDPNIE, also inhibits DP IV activity and suppresses DNA synthesis of tetanus toxoid-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC). Here, we present the influence of amino acid exchanges in the first three positions of Tat(l-9). For instance, the replacement of D2 of Tat(l-9) by G or K generated peptides, which inhibit DP IV-catalyzed IL-2(1-12) cleavage nearly threefold stronger. Similar effects were observed on the suppression of DNA synthesis of Tetanus toxoid-stimulated PBMC. This correlation suggests that Tat(l-9)-deduced peptides mediate antiproliferative effects at least in part via specific DP IV interactions and supports the hypothesis that CD26 plays a key role in the regulation of lymphocyte growth.
Bücher und Buchkapitel
Compared to the N-terminal nonapeptide of the HIV-1 Tat protein as inhibitor of activity of DP IV which is supposed to mediate the immunosuppressive effects of HIV-1 Tat, the Ile5 and Leu6 analogues showed strongly reduced inhibitory activity. Interestingly, replacement of Asp2 with Gly or Lys led to compounds with considerably enhanced inhibition. Therefore, we have applied 1H NMR spectroscopy and restrained molecular dynamics calculations to elucidate the molecular conformation of a series of Tat nonapeptides. Conformational backbone differences of these peptides as well as the nature and the arrangement of the side chains per se at significant positions preventing effective binding to DP IV might explain their different inhibitory activity on DP IV.