Dem IPB wird erneut ein beispielhaftes Handeln im Sinne einer chancengleichheitsorientierten Personal- und Organisationspolitik bescheinigt. Das Institut erhält zum 6. Mal in Folge das TOTAL E-QUALITY…
Die Plant Science Student Conference (PSSC) wird seit 20 Jahren im jährlichen Wechsel von Studierenden der beiden Leibniz-Institute IPK und IPB organisiert. Im Interview erläutern Christina Wäsch…
General thermodynamic calculations using the semiempiric PM3 method have led to the conclusion that prenyldiphosphate converting enzymes require at least one divalent metal cation for the activation and cleavage of the diphosphate–prenyl ester bond, or they must provide structural elements for the efficient stabilization of the intermediate prenyl cation. The most important common structural features, which guide the product specificity in both terpene synthases and aromatic prenyl transferases are aromatic amino acid side chains, which stabilize prenyl cations by cation–π interactions. In the case of aromatic prenyl transferases, a proton abstraction from the phenolic hydroxyl group of the second substrate will enhance the electron density in the phenolic ortho-position at which initial prenylation of the aromatic compound usually occurs.A model of the structure of the integral transmembrane-bound aromatic prenyl transferase UbiA was developed, which currently represents the first structural insight into this group of prenylating enzymes with a fold different from most other aromatic prenyl transferases. Based on this model, the structure–activity relationships and mechanistic aspects of related proteins, for example those of Lithospermum erythrorhizon or the enzyme AuaA from Stigmatella aurantiaca involved in the aurachin biosynthesis, were elucidated. The high similarity of this group of aromatic prenyltransferases to 5-epi-aristolochene synthase is an indication of an evolutionary relationship with terpene synthases (cyclases). This is further supported by the conserved DxxxD motif found in both protein families. In contrast, there is no such relationship to the aromatic prenyl transferases with an ABBA-fold, such as NphB, or to any other known family of prenyl converting enzymes. Therefore, it is possible that these two groups might have different evolutionary ancestors.
The functional role of isoprenoids and especially enzymatic prenylation in nature and human application is briefly covered, with the focus on bioinformatical, mechanistical and structural aspects of prenyltransferases and terpene synthases. These enzymes are as yet underrepresented but perspectively useful biocatalysts for C–C couplings of aromatic and isoprenoid substrates. Some examples of the successful use in chemoenzymatic synthesis are given including an application for the otherwise difficult synthesis of Kuhistanol A. Computational structure-based site-directed mutagenesis can be used for rational enzyme redesign to obtain altered substrate and product specificities, which is demonstrated for terpene cyclases.