0

Metabolomics has become a crucial phenotyping technique in a range of research fields including medicine, the life sciences, biotechnology and the environmental sciences. This necessitates the transfer of experimental information between research groups, as well as potentially to publishers and funders. After the initial efforts of the metabolomics standards initiative, minimum reporting standards were proposed which included the concepts for metabolomics databases. Built by the community, standards and infrastructure for metabolomics are still needed to allow storage, exchange, comparison and re-utilization of metabolomics data. The Framework Programme 7 EU Initiative ‘coordination of standards in metabolomics’ (COSMOS) is developing a robust data infrastructure and exchange standards for metabolomics data and metadata. This is to support workflows for a broad range of metabolomics applications within the European metabolomics community and the wider metabolomics and biomedical communities’ participation. Here we announce our concepts and efforts asking for re-engagement of the metabolomics community, academics and industry, journal publishers, software and hardware vendors, as well as those interested in standardisation worldwide (addressing missing metabolomics ontologies, complex-metadata capturing and XML based open source data exchange format), to join and work towards updating and implementing metabolomics standards.

Univariate hypotheses tests such as Student’s t test or variance analysis (ANOVA) can help to answer a variety of questions in metabolomics data analysis. The statistical power of these tests depends on the setup of the experiment, the experimental design and the analytical variance of the actual observations. In this paper, we demonstrate how a well-designed pilot study prior to an experiment with the aim to find differences between e.g. several genotypes, can help to determine the variance at multiple levels ranging from biological variance, sample preparation to instrumental variances. Next, we illustrate how these variances can be used to obtain several parameters (e.g. minimum statistically significant effect, number of required replicates and error probabilities) which influence the design of the actual study. In particular, we are going to sketch how technical replicates can improve the performance of a test, when they are correctly used in the statistical analysis, e.g. with a hierarchical model. Finally, we demonstrate the process of evaluating the trade-off between different experimental designs with different replication strategies. The choice of an experimental design beyond the gut feeling can be influenced by factors such as costs, sample availability and the accuracy of of the tests. We use metabolite profiles of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana measured on an UPLC-ESI/QqTOF-MS as real-world dataset, but the approach is equally applicable to other sample types and measurement methods like NMR based metabolomics.

0

Metabolomics has become a crucial phenotyping technique in a range of research fields including medicine, the life sciences, biotechnology and the environmental sciences. This necessitates the transfer of experimental information between research groups, as well as potentially to publishers and funders. After the initial efforts of the metabolomics standards initiative, minimum reporting standards were proposed which included the concepts for metabolomics databases. Built by the community, standards and infrastructure for metabolomics are still needed to allow storage, exchange, comparison and re-utilization of metabolomics data. The Framework Programme 7 EU Initiative ‘coordination of standards in metabolomics’ (COSMOS) is developing a robust data infrastructure and exchange standards for metabolomics data and metadata. This is to support workflows for a broad range of metabolomics applications within the European metabolomics community and the wider metabolomics and biomedical communities’ participation. Here we announce our concepts and efforts asking for re-engagement of the metabolomics community, academics and industry, journal publishers, software and hardware vendors, as well as those interested in standardisation worldwide (addressing missing metabolomics ontologies, complex-metadata capturing and XML based open source data exchange format), to join and work towards updating and implementing metabolomics standards.

Univariate hypotheses tests such as Student’s t test or variance analysis (ANOVA) can help to answer a variety of questions in metabolomics data analysis. The statistical power of these tests depends on the setup of the experiment, the experimental design and the analytical variance of the actual observations. In this paper, we demonstrate how a well-designed pilot study prior to an experiment with the aim to find differences between e.g. several genotypes, can help to determine the variance at multiple levels ranging from biological variance, sample preparation to instrumental variances. Next, we illustrate how these variances can be used to obtain several parameters (e.g. minimum statistically significant effect, number of required replicates and error probabilities) which influence the design of the actual study. In particular, we are going to sketch how technical replicates can improve the performance of a test, when they are correctly used in the statistical analysis, e.g. with a hierarchical model. Finally, we demonstrate the process of evaluating the trade-off between different experimental designs with different replication strategies. The choice of an experimental design beyond the gut feeling can be influenced by factors such as costs, sample availability and the accuracy of of the tests. We use metabolite profiles of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana measured on an UPLC-ESI/QqTOF-MS as real-world dataset, but the approach is equally applicable to other sample types and measurement methods like NMR based metabolomics.

0

0