Computational Plant Biochemistry

Liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) is increasingly popular for the non-targeted exploration of complex samples, where tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is used to characterize the structure of unknown compounds. However, mass spectra do not always contain sufficient information to unequivocally identify the correct structure. This study investigated how much additional information can be gained using hydrogen deuterium exchange (HDX) experiments. The exchange of “easily exchangeable” hydrogen atoms (connected to heteroatoms), with predominantly [M+D]+ ions in positive mode and [M-D]− in negative mode was observed. To enable high-throughput processing, new scoring terms were incorporated into the in silico fragmenter MetFrag. These were initially developed on small datasets and then tested on 762 compounds of environmental interest. Pairs of spectra (normal and deuterated) were found for 593 of these substances (506 positive mode, 155 negative mode spectra). The new scoring terms resulted in 29 additional correct identifications (78 vs 49) for positive mode and an increase in top 10 rankings from 80 to 106 in negative mode. Compounds with dual functionality (polar head group, long apolar tail) exhibited dramatic retention time (RT) shifts of up to several minutes, compared with an average 0.04 min RT shift. For a smaller dataset of 80 metabolites, top 10 rankings improved from 13 to 24 (positive mode, 57 spectra) and from 14 to 31 (negative mode, 63 spectra) when including HDX information. The results of standard measurements were confirmed using targets and tentatively identified surfactant species in an environmental sample collected from the river Danube near Novi Sad (Serbia). The changes to MetFrag have been integrated into the command line version available at http://c-ruttkies.github.io/MetFrag and all resulting spectra and compounds are available in online resources and in the Electronic Supplementary Material (ESM).

In nontarget screening, structure elucidation of small molecules from high resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) data is challenging, particularly the selection of the most likely candidate structure among the many retrieved from compound databases. Several fragmentation and retention prediction methods have been developed to improve this candidate selection. In order to evaluate their performance, we compared two in silico fragmenters (MetFrag and CFM-ID) and two retention time prediction models (based on the chromatographic hydrophobicity index (CHI) and on log D). A set of 78 known organic micropollutants was analyzed by liquid chromatography coupled to a LTQ Orbitrap HRMS with electrospray ionization (ESI) in positive and negative mode using two fragmentation techniques with different collision energies. Both fragmenters (MetFrag and CFM-ID) performed well for most compounds, with average ranking the correct candidate structure within the top 25% and 22 to 37% for ESI+ and ESI− mode, respectively. The rank of the correct candidate structure slightly improved when MetFrag and CFM-ID were combined. For unknown compounds detected in both ESI+ and ESI−, generally positive mode mass spectra were better for further structure elucidation. Both retention prediction models performed reasonably well for more hydrophobic compounds but not for early eluting hydrophilic substances. The log D prediction showed a better accuracy than the CHI model. Although the two fragmentation prediction methods are more diagnostic and sensitive for candidate selection, the inclusion of retention prediction by calculating a consensus score with optimized weighting can improve the ranking of correct candidates as compared to the individual methods.

In this paper, we describe data processing and metabolite identification approaches which lead to a rapid and semi-automated interpretation of metabolomics experiments. Data from metabolite fingerprinting using LC-ESI-Q-TOF/MS were processed with several open-source software packages, including XCMS and CAMERA to detect features and group features into compound spectra. Next, we describe the automatic scheduling of tandem mass spectrometry (MS) acquisitions to acquire a large number of MS/MS spectra, and the subsequent processing and computer-assisted annotation towards identification using the R packages MetShot, Rdisop, and the MetFusion application. We also implement a simple retention time prediction model using predicted lipophilicity logD, which predicts retention times within 42 s (6 min gradient) for most compounds in our setup. We putatively identified 44 common metabolites including several amino acids and phospholipids at metabolomics standards initiative (MSI) levels two and three and confirmed the majority of them by comparison with authentic standards at MSI level one. To aid both data integration within and data sharing between laboratories, we integrated data from two labs and mapped retention times between the chromatographic systems. Despite the different MS instrumentation and different chromatographic gradient programs, the mapped retention times agree within 26 s (20 min gradient) for 90 % of the mapped features.

The identification of compounds from mass spectrometry (MS) data is still seen as a major bottleneck in the interpretation of MS data. This is particularly the case for the identification of small compounds such as metabolites, where until recently little progress has been made. Here we review the available approaches to annotation and identification of chemical compounds based on electrospray ionization (ESI-MS) data. The methods are not limited to metabolomics applications, but are applicable to any small compounds amenable to MS analysis. Starting with the definition of identification, we focus on the analysis of tandem mass and MS n spectra, which can provide a wealth of structural information. Searching in libraries of reference spectra provides the most reliable source of identification, especially if measured on comparable instruments. We review several choices for the distance functions. The identification without reference spectra is even more challenging, because it requires approaches to interpret tandem mass spectra with regard to the molecular structure. Both commercial and free tools are capable of mining general-purpose compound libraries, and identifying candidate compounds. The holy grail of computational mass spectrometry is the de novo deduction of structure hypotheses for compounds, where method development has only started thus far. In a case study, we apply several of the available methods to the three compounds, kaempferol, reserpine, and verapamil, and investigate whether this results in reliable identifications.