Publikationen - Molekulare Signalverarbeitung

Viroids, due to their small size and lack of protein-coding capacity, must rely essentially on their hosts for replication. Intriguingly, viroids have evolved the ability to replicate in two cellular organella, the nucleus (family Pospiviroidae) and the chloroplast (family Avsunviroidae). Viroid replication proceeds through an RNA-based rolling-circle mechanism with three steps that, with some variations, operate in both polarity strands: i) synthesis of longer-than-unit strands catalyzed by either the nuclear RNA polymerase II or a nuclear-encoded chloroplastic RNA polymerase, in both instances redirected to transcribe RNA templates, ii) cleavage to unit-length, which in the family Avsunviroidae is mediated by hammerhead ribozymes embedded in both polarity strands, while in the family Pospiviroidae the oligomeric RNAs provide the proper conformation but not the catalytic activity, and iii) circularization. The host RNA polymerases, most likely assisted by additional host proteins, start transcription from specific sites, thus implying the existence of viroid promoters. Cleavage and ligation in the family Pospiviroidae is probably catalyzed by an RNase III-like enzyme and an RNA ligase able to circularize the resulting 5’ and 3’ termini. Whether a chloroplastic RNA ligase mediates circularization in the family Avsunviroidae, or this reaction is autocatalytic, remains an open issue.

Cachexia disease of citrus is caused by Hop stunt viroid (HSVd). In citrus, pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains differ by a “cachexia expression motif” of five to six nucleotides located in the variable domain of the proposed rod-like secondary structure. Here, site-directed mutants were generated to investigate if all these nucleotides were required for infectivity and/or symptom expression. Specifically an artificial cachexia inducing mutant M0 was generated by introducing the six nucleotides changes of the “cachexia expression motif” into a non-pathogenic sequence variant and M0 was used as a template to systematically restore some of the introduced changes. The resulting mutants in which specific changes introduced to generate M0, were restored presented a variety of responses: (i) M1, obtained by introducing two insertions forming a base-pair, was infectious but non-pathogenic; (ii) M2, obtained by introducing an insertion and restoring a substitution, presented low infectivity and the resulting progeny reverted to M0; (iii) M3, obtained by restoring a single substitution in the lower strand of the viroid secondary structure, was infectious but induced only mild cachexia symptoms; (iv) M4, obtained by restoring a single susbtitution in the upper strand of the viroid secondary structure, was non-infectious. These results confirm that the “cachexia expression motif” plays a major role in inciting cachexia symptoms, and that subtle changes within this motif affect symptom severity and may even suppress symptom expression.