Publications - Molecular Signal Processing
Search narrowed by
Advanced Search
- Type of publication
- Publication (1)
- Year
- 2021 (1)
- Journal / Volume / Preprint Server Sorted by frequency and by alphabetical order
- Plant Physiol. (30)
- Plant J. (28)
- 0 (27)
- Phytochemistry (21)
- Planta (13)
- FEBS Lett. (12)
- Plant Cell (12)
- bioRxiv (12)
- J. Exp. Bot. (11)
- PLOS ONE (10)
- New Phytol. (9)
- Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. (9)
- Trends Plant Sci. (9)
- J. Biol. Chem. (8)
- Curr. Biol. (7)
- Front. Plant Sci. (7)
- J. Plant Physiol. (7)
- Plant Cell Physiol. (7)
- Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. (6)
- Methods Mol. Biol. (6)
- BMC Plant Biol. (5)
- Biol. Chem. (5)
- Nat. Plants (5)
- Plant Growth Regul. (5)
- Plant Signal Behav. (5)
- Theor. Appl. Genet. (5)
- J. Plant Growth Regul. (4)
- Nat. Commun. (4)
- Nucleic Acids Res. (4)
- Ann. Bot. (3)
- Bot. Acta (3)
- EMBO J. (3)
- Int. J. Mol. Sci. (3)
- Mol. Plant (3)
- Nat. Chem. Biol. (3)
- Physiol. Plant. (3)
- Plant Mol. Biol. (3)
- Virus Res. (3)
- eLife (3)
- ACS Chem. Biol. (2)
- Amino Acids (2)
- Anal. Biochem. (2)
- Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. (2)
- BMC Biol. (2)
- Bio Protoc. (2)
- Biochem. Soc. Trans. (2)
- Biologie in unserer Zeit (2)
- Chromatographia (2)
- Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. (2)
- Fett/Lipid (2)
- Gene (2)
- Genetika (2)
- J. Chromatogr. A (2)
- J. Gen. Virol. (2)
- Mol. Biol. Evol. (2)
- Nature (2)
- New Biotechnol. (2)
- PLOS Pathog. (2)
- Plant Biol. (2)
- Plant Cell Environ. (2)
- Plant Sci. (2)
- Plants (2)
- RNA Biol. (2)
- Sci. Rep. (2)
- Science (2)
- Seed Sci. Res. (2)
- Virology (2)
- Acta Biol. Szeged. (1)
- Acta Physiol. Plant. (1)
- Annu. Plant Rev. (1)
- Annu. Rev. Microbiol. (1)
- Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. (1)
- AoB PLANTS (1)
- Arch. Virol. (1)
- Autophagy (1)
- BBA-Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids (1)
- BIOspektrum (1)
- BMC Evol. Biol. (1)
- BMC Genomics (1)
- BioEssays (1)
- Biocell (1)
- Biochem. J. (1)
- Biochemistry (1)
- Biochimie (1)
- Biologia (1)
- Biology of Plant-Microbe Interactions (1)
- Biotechnol. Adv. (1)
- Biotechnol. Lett. (1)
- Braz. J. Plant Physiol. (1)
- Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. (1)
- Cell (1)
- Cell Rep. (1)
- Cereal Res. Commun. (1)
- ChemBioChem (1)
- ChemRxiv (1)
- Curr. Opin. Biotech. (1)
- Cytoskeleton (1)
- Dev. Cell (1)
- Development (1)
- Drugs Exp. Clin. Res. (1)
- Author Sorted by frequency and by alphabetical order
- Abdel-Aziz, A. K. (1)
- Abdelfatah, S. (1)
- Abdellatif, M. (1)
- Abdoli, A. (1)
- Abel, S. (1)
- Klionsky, D. J. (1)
- Naumann, C. (1)
- et al., . (1)
Displaying results 1 to 1 of 1.
Klionsky, D. J.; Abdel-Aziz, A. K.; Abdelfatah, S.; Abdellatif, M.; Abdoli, A.; Abel, S.; Naumann, C.; et al., .; Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) Autophagy 17, 1-382, (2021) DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2020.1797280
In 2008, we published the first set of guidelines for standardizing research in autophagy. Since then, this topic has received increasing attention, and many scientists have entered the field. Our knowledge base and relevant new technologies have also been expanding. Thus, it is important to formulate on a regular basis updated guidelines for monitoring autophagy in different organisms. Despite numerous reviews, there continues to be confusion regarding acceptable methods to evaluate autophagy, especially in multicellular eukaryotes. Here, we present a set of guidelines for investigators to select and interpret methods to examine autophagy and related processes, and for reviewers to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of reports that are focused on these processes. These guidelines are not meant to be a dogmatic set of rules, because the appropriateness of any assay largely depends on the question being asked and the system being used. Moreover, no individual assay is perfect for every situation, calling for the use of multiple techniques to properly monitor autophagy in each experimental setting. Finally, several core components of the autophagy machinery have been implicated in distinct auto-phagic processes (canonical and noncanonical autophagy), implying that genetic approaches to block autophagy should rely on targeting two or more autophagy-related genes that ideally participate in distinct steps of the pathway. Along similar lines, because multiple proteins involved in autophagy also regulate other cellular pathways including apoptosis, not all of them can be used as a specific marker for bona fide autophagic responses. Here, we critically discuss current methods of assessing autophagy and the information they can, or cannot, provide. Our ultimate goal is to encourage intellectual and technical innovation in the field.